с удовольствием поверю вам, после ссылки на оригинальный текст этих «пояснений еврокомиссии от 4.8.2011» ;-)
Example:<i> A Moroccan national wishes to travel to Belgium for business reasons (6 days) and intends to visit relatives in France on the same occasion (6 days). He will arrive at and leave from Amsterdam (Netherlands).</i>
The duration of intended stays in Belgium or France are identical and thus either the French or the Belgian consulate should deal with the application. Each of them constitutes a maindestination; the Member State of first entry should not become responsible for dealing with the
application.”2.1.3. If no main destination can be determined, the consulate of the Member State whose external border the applicant intends to cross must deal with applicationвсе-верно, только это не пункт B, а пункт С.
1. The Member State competent for examining and deciding
on an application for a uniform visa shall be:
(a) the Member State whose territory constitutes the sole destination
of the visit(s);
(b) if the visit includes more than one destination, the Member
State whose territory constitutes the main destination of the
visit(s) in terms of the length or purpose of stay; or
© if no main destination can be determined, the Member State
whose external border the applicant intends to cross in
order to enter the territory of the Member States.
Так записано в визовом кодексе ЕС, однако в связи с пояснениями Еврокомиссии от 4.8.2011 г.* теперь это уже больше теоретический случай.
|
|
NOTE987